Memorandum from Karlan on The Proper Standard of Remand in Swint; List of US Supreme Court Reports
Working File
January 1, 1985

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Memorandum and Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for the Entry of Declaratory Judgement and Injunctive Relief, 1983. 66aef257-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/955d6273-8837-40e7-ac3b-208599b1e9b6/memorandum-and-order-on-plaintiffs-motion-for-the-entry-of-declaratory-judgement-and-injunctive-relief. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
a IN THE T'NTTED STATES DISTRTET @TIRT POR TEE I,TIDDLE DISTRICT OP GBORGI,A THOMAS1'!'.Y.E DIVISION CM. ACIION IrO. 75-3,0-tTlOt'tTHOMASVILLE BRA}ICE OF TTIB NAACP, €t al., PlaLntl.ffe V. rBolrAs @tliITY, GEORGIA, et Ilefeadants ) , I I I I "t.rl , ) FILEP ,r3:{.1-...}n.#*,.'-"*}r HE|IoRAIIDUU I}ID ORDER ON PI,ATNTIFPS I }I(yTIOrg FOR IIRE EIIIHT OP DESI^ARATORY JUDG}TEI{![ A}ID INJIINqTIITE RSLTEF !a !,he ca;e abve lderr0if,ie.i 'r;br: FiaintLffs have fiied a mtlon for declaratoty Judgment rnd lor lnJrrncttrre rellef and have flled a brlef in aupport of ttre rctlon. tlhe Defendants have flled a brlef ln opposltlon to the rctJ.on. In the rcBt recent declsion by ttre Court of Appeals dealing vlttr thla case tbe natter vas remanded to ttrls Court for a reevaluatlon of ttre queation of Lntent, the court of Appeals detenlnlng ttrat tnrt uas txe only re'rrlnlng lgsue ia the caae rtich had to be deteralned ln favor of tlre Platntiffg to enable the Plalatlffe to prevall. Borever, tJrc C-ngress has nfr arended tbc Votlagr Blghte Act of 1965 laclu&lng e rpeclfls rrnesdgrent to Sactlon 2 of tbat Ast, a2 U.S.C. 51973, detcmJ.nlng ttrat lntent ls Do longer rcgrrlred to be proved, ln a caae of thia aort. rn l1ght of thle areadreat to ttre Votlng Rl'ghtg Act and tlre prevlous JAN 2 61983 il'''ifl "Eilt ltl 8!'li!'.fil il 1l il fln6lnga of thia Court rhich bave been afflrmed by ttre Court of Appeals, lt ls ngul clear that tlre Plalntlf fs are ent,ld,lea to prevall on ttrelr challenge to the at-larqre Danner of electing County CorEdssloners ln Itrouras @unty. It lollore that the Plalntlffs are entitled to the rellef sought. Consietent s1tlr the foregolng, thi not1on of the plalntllfs tor ttre entrfr of a declaratorT Jud,gment la granted an<1 the Court hereby dete:cmlnea that the ctrrrent method of electlng @unty Colo,legloners ln lhonae County ls contaary to federal lau aa now establLghed. ttrla neana tlrat a ner d:lgtrlct electlon plan utlllzing no at-latge seata uust be adopted and, a epecial electLon rqrst be coaducted at anr early date. It only saprtng to be deterulned hor thls change ls to be brought about. lthe Plalntiffs ask that the Court devlse a new election plan and Ln the meantlrc enJoin tlre recently elected thouas County Coloiaslonera from performLng the functlons of thel'r office. Ehe Court rculd nuch prefer that ttre solution to this probleur be brought about by leglslatlve act, and rlth tbe hope that tJre uecesaarl,, changes nay be brought about ln that fashlon the @urt rl11 not at ttrls tine grant the Plalntlffer prayers for lujunctlve rellef. In ttre abgence of a leglslatlve aolutlon lt u111, of clousse, be necestarl' tor ttre court to grant the inJunctlve rellef eought. IT IS SO ORDERED thle 26th day of JanuarT, 1983. i. nonrnr EltrorI T'NTTED STASES DISTRI T JUDGE