1-20 of 20

Content type Title Description
Memo from Mimi to Lani RE: Cases cited that use Rule 52 (a) Date is approximate.
Memo from Mimi to Lani RE: All the lower courts use standards compatable with Rule 52 (a) Date is approximate.
Case Summaries Date is approximate.
U.S. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 84L Ed 2d (Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, NC)
U.S. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 80 L Ed 2d (Bose Corporation v. Consumers Union of United States)
U.S. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 72L Ed 2d (Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v Ives Laboratories v Darby Drug Co.)
U.S. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 74L Ed 2d (Brown v Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee)
U.S. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 73L Ed 2d (Rogers v. Lodge)
Whitcomb v. Chavis Court Opinion; Ketchum v. Bryne Court Opinion; McMillan v. Escambia County Court Opinion; Nevett v. Sides Court Opinion;
Memorandum from Chris to Guinier on Rule(52)a and Gingles Date is approximate.
U.S. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 72L Ed 2d (Pullman-Standard v. Swint)
Velasquez v. Abilene Court Opinion; Attorney Notes
Legal Research on Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 50-52; on Pullman Standard v. Swint and "Clearly Erroneous" Rule; List of US Supreme Court Reports
Memorandum from Chris to Guinier on FRCP Rule 52(a) Date is approximate.
Attorney Notes on Rule 52(a) Date is approximate.
Annotated Memorandum from Karlan on "Clearly Erroneous" Rule Date is approximate.
Memorandum from Karlan on The Proper Standard of Remand in Swint; List of US Supreme Court Reports Date is approximate.
Memorandum from Hall to Liebman
Annotated Supplemental Brief for Appellees Date is approximate.
Collins v. City of Norfolk Court Opinion
Return to top